Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 05-01-2012, 11:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
He doesn't need a lecture from me, but it seems questionable for an attorney to be bad mouthing the police like that. We are supposed to promote good will toward the justice system.
Adversarial system. It's not an attorney's job (unless a prosecutor) to give the government mad oral pleasure. Plus the whole freedom of speech thing.

PS - the police are part of the executive branch, not judicial.

Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 05-01-2012, 12:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Adversarial system. It's not an attorney's job (unless a prosecutor) to give the government mad oral pleasure. Plus the whole freedom of speech thing.

PS - the police are part of the executive branch, not judicial.
I didn't say "judicial," I said "justice." The police, I'm sure you will agree, are part of the justice system.

It definitely is an adversarial system, but the adversarial part should remain in the courtroom. Outside of court, all participants - lawyers, judges, police, etc. - should do their best to promote good will toward the system. The system deserves respect, IMHO.

And what does freedom of speech have to do with it? Nobody suggested that he is prohibited from saying that the police "usually" lie. I just exercised my right to say that I disagree with his choice of words.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 05-01-2012, 12:03 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 32,604
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 05-01-2012, 12:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
It definitely is an adversarial system, but the adversarial part should remain in the courtroom. Outside of court, all participants - lawyers, judges, police, etc. - should do their best to promote good will toward the system. The system deserves respect, IMHO.
Any system that keeps 1% of its population in prison deserves a pimp-slap to its thick, backward skull. We're doing something wrong, and anyone who's a cog in the system shares some of the blame.

And "just doing my job" isn't an excuse, at least not since 1945.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 05-01-2012, 01:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Any system that keeps 1% of its population in prison deserves a pimp-slap to its thick, backward skull. We're doing something wrong, and anyone who's a cog in the system shares some of the blame.

And "just doing my job" isn't an excuse, at least not since 1945.
Amen to that. The rate at which we imprison black males would embarrass Stalin. It is fricking insane.

Here's the book to read on that subject: "The Collapse of American Criminal Justice" by William Stuntz. Fantastic book.

While I agree with you on that point, describing police as "usually" dishonest doesn't help. Police dishonesty is an issue that has always been there and always will be, but it doesn't explain why we have such a punitive, ineffective, and expensive system of criminal justice.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 05-01-2012, 01:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
While I agree with you on that point, describing police as "usually" dishonest doesn't help.
In some areas (not all of the US), this may be the case. Walk a mile in another man's shoes...
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 05-01-2012, 01:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
In some areas (not all of the US), this may be the case. Walk a mile in another man's shoes...
I don't follow your remark about walking a mile in another man's shoes. I feel as if I am missing something here.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 05-01-2012, 01:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
I don't follow your remark about walking a mile in another man's shoes. I feel as if I am missing something here.
Grow up poor and in the wrong area, and it may well seem that every cop is out to get you locked up, justifiably or not.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 05-01-2012, 01:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Grow up poor and in the wrong area, and it may well seem that every cop is out to get you locked up, justifiably or not.
I don't doubt it.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 05-01-2012, 02:04 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
speaking of 'out to get somebody'.......

Dershowitz: Testilying, December 1, 1998
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 05-01-2012, 02:22 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
Amen to that. The rate at which we imprison black males would embarrass Stalin. It is fricking insane.
.
Uncle Joe wouldn't have housed that many prisoners; it was too expensive. He'd just have them all shot.

Hopefully we are a bit better than that.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 05-01-2012, 02:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Uncle Joe wouldn't have housed that many prisoners; it was too expensive. He'd just have them all shot.

Hopefully we are a bit better than that.
Actually, the USSR didn't have the death penalty for a long time under Stalin. People were just sent to concentration camps to be worked to death or shot while trying to escape.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 05-01-2012, 08:07 PM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Actually, the USSR didn't have the death penalty for a long time under Stalin. People were just sent to concentration camps to be worked to death or shot while trying to escape.
A distinction without a difference--at least to the one shot.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 05-02-2012, 08:30 AM
Fold on dotted line
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Mich
Posts: 3,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
In some areas (not all of the US), this may be the case. Walk a mile in another man's shoes...
Gents,

Be advised that the courts have upheld the fact that during an interrogation, police may use psychological intimidation, sarcasm, lying and trickery to get information from any DETAINEE, whether they have been charged with something or not.

The same is true with the US DoD Rules of Engagement and the Geneva Convention of 1949.

So, this means the police may lie at will with no impact on the case, if it serves their ends.

You only need identify yourself by producing ID documents. That is a requirement. Anything else is voluntary.

If the cop decides to intimidate you, say nothing and look at him. If he is friendly, be friendly but limit data.

" I don't know" is an acceptable answer until your lawyer gets there. Silence and "I want my lawyer" is better.

I say this because I see too many municipalities doing things to collect money, not for public safety.

I have seen a Virginia county/municipality (?) that decided to lower the DUI blood count from 0.08 to 0.01!

Since it wasn't a "dry" county and they didn't advertise it, it didn't make the news.

Until suddenly a whole bunch of people who had half a beer got stopped at a "routine" traffic checkpoint and were charged with DUI.

They made the fatal mistake of charging some senior Administration Officials who are part of a program which requires reporting oif such things.

Needless to say, the White House called the Governor, the Governor called the county...well, you get the idea. $hit rolls downhill.

I know this to be a fact because I sat in one one of the hearings about a year ago.

This is trolling for cash, not justice. It needs to be called what it is.

Then the entire country needs to boycott this area until the the people who set this up are fired or removed from office.
__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 05-02-2012, 08:42 AM
disley's Avatar
W124 Benz owner
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 27
If they ask you how fast you were going always say whatever the speed limit is.
If you say you don't know, they will increase the speed you were actually travelling to the next highest fine level.

__________________
1989 W124 260E
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page