Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #346  
Old 12-16-2012, 10:01 PM
edge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
What criteria do you use to classify a weapon as an ASSAULT WEAPON?? Black and scary? Looks like it could be used by the military?? Perhaps a weapon was purchased for use as a DEFENSE WEAPON, or as a SPORTING WEAPON.

The local gun club that I am a member of has teams of members that compete with weapons you would classify as an ASSAULT WEAPON. The truth of the matter is that it's never been used in an assaulting manner, only as a competition firearm.
By Sari Horwitz, Published: December 15

Adam Lanza forced his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School carrying a Glock, a SIG Sauer and a Bushmaster rifle, all legally registered to his mother, law enforcement officials said, and all capable of massive killing power.

He chose the rifle over the two handguns to massacre most of his 26 victims in a matter of minutes, inflicting “devastating” multiple wounds, said Connecticut’s chief medical examiner.

The Washington Post
GRAPHIC | Two of the deadliest massacres happened this year, but 11 others also claimed lives.

Police said that they found “dozens and dozens” of shell casings from .223 high-velocity rounds inside the school, the type of spent casings that come from bullets used in the Bushmaster rifle.

The lightweight .223 bullets travel at a velocity of about 3,000 feet per second, and after they enter their target, they explode throughout the tissue. As the medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II put it at a news conference Saturday, the bullets’ “energy stays in the body.”

Reply With Quote
  #347  
Old 12-16-2012, 10:35 PM
edge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,405
Brothers in arms, yes, but the US needs to get rid of its guns

Brothers in arms, yes, but the US needs to get rid of its guns
August 1, 2012

John Howard
Australia was right to take a different path to the US and opt for gun control.

EARLY in 2008 Janette and I were guests of the former president, George H. W. Bush or ''41'', as he is affectionately known, at his Presidential Library in College Station, Texas. I spoke to a warm and friendly audience of more than 300 who enthusiastically reacted until, in answer to a request to nominate the proudest actions of the Australian government I had led for almost 12 years, I included the national gun control laws enacted after the Port Arthur massacre in April 1996.

Having applauded my references to the liberation of East Timor, leaving Australia debt free, presiding over a large reduction in unemployment and standing beside the US in the global fight against terrorism, there was an audible gasp of amazement at my expressing pride in what Australia had done to limit the use of guns.

I had been given a sharp reminder that, despite the many things we have in common with our American friends, there is a huge cultural divide when it comes to the free availability of firearms.

Just under two weeks ago, my wife and I were in Dallas, Texas, when the mass shooting in Aurora, Colorado, took place. The responses of President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, his presumed Republican opponent, were as predictable as they were disappointing. While expressing sorrow at such a loss of life, both quickly said that they supported the Second Amendment to the US constitution: long regarded as providing an extensive right for Americans to bear arms.

The Second Amendment, crafted in the immediate post-revolutionary years, is more than 200 years old and was designed to protect the right of local communities to raise and maintain militia for use against external threats (including the newly formed national government!). It bears no relationship at all to the circumstances of everyday life in America today. Yet there is a near religious fervour about protecting the right of Americans to have their guns - and plenty of them.

In this respect it is worth noting that the local police claim that James Holmes, the man now formally charged over the Aurora shootings, had in his possession an AR15 assault rifle (similar to one used by Martin Bryant at Port Arthur), a shotgun and two Glock handguns and 6000 rounds of ammunition. All had been legally obtained.

Obama and Romney are both highly intelligent, decent men who care deeply about the safety of Americans. Yet such is the strength of the pro-gun culture in their country that neither felt able to use the Aurora tragedy as a reason to start a serious debate on gun control.

There is more to this than merely the lobbying strength of the National Rifle Association and the proximity of the November presidential election. It is hard to believe that their reaction would have been any different if the murders in Aurora had taken place immediately after the election of either Obama or Romney. So deeply embedded is the gun culture of the US, that millions of law-abiding, Americans truly believe that it is safer to own a gun, based on the chilling logic that because there are so many guns in circulation, one's own weapon is needed for self-protection. To put it another way, the situation is so far gone there can be no turning back.

The murder rate in the US is roughly four times that in each of Australia, New Zealand, and Britain. Even the most diehard supporter of guns must concede that America's lax firearms laws are a major part of the explanation for such a disparity.

On April 28, 1996, Bryant, using two weapons, killed 35 people in Tasmania. It was, at that time, the largest number of people who had died in a single series of incidents at the hands of one person.

The national gun control laws delivered by the Howard government, following this tragedy received bipartisan support. They, nonetheless, caused internal difficulties for some of my then National Party colleagues. Tim Fischer and John Anderson, then leader and deputy leader of the National Party federally, as well as Rob Borbidge, then National Party premier of Queensland, courageously faced down opponents in their own ranks to support a measure they knew to be in the national interest. Many believed, in the months that followed, that hostility towards these gun laws played a role in the emergence of Pauline Hanson's One Nation cause.

These national gun laws have proven beneficial. Research published in 2010 in the American Journal of Law and Economics found that firearm homicides, in Australia, dropped 59 per cent between 1995 and 2006. There was no offsetting increase in non-firearm-related murders. Researchers at Harvard University in 2011 revealed that in the 18 years prior to the 1996 Australian laws, there were 13 gun massacres (four or more fatalities) in Australia, resulting in 102 deaths. There have been none in that category since the Port Arthur laws.

A key component of the 1996 measure, which banned the sale, importation and possession of all automatic and semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, was a national buy-back scheme involving the compulsory forfeiture of newly illegal weapons. Between 1996 and 1998 more than 700,000 guns were removed and destroyed. This was one-fifth of Australia's estimated stock of firearms. The equivalent in the US would have been 40 million guns. Australia's action remains one of the largest destructions of civilian firearms.


Australia is a safer country as a result of what was done in 1996. It will be the continuing responsibility of current and future federal and state governments to ensure the effectiveness of those anti-gun laws is never weakened. The US is a country for which I have much affection. There are many American traits which we Australians could well emulate to our great benefit. But when it comes to guns we have been right to take a radically different path.

John Howard was prime minister from 1996 to 2007.



Read more: Brothers in arms, yes, but the US needs to get rid of its guns
Reply With Quote
  #348  
Old 12-16-2012, 10:52 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post




Valid points. Certainly anything the government will do is going to end up a hack job with poor results.

What I have been trying to get from some of these people is a realization that the public opinion is moving away from the gun owners, and if they cannot tone down the rhetoric to at least appear sensible, then their voices and opinions are going to be discounted. That will not prove to be a benefit to the responsible gun owners.

As drop as stated, our country is awash with weapons, and people would like to see something done about it. If any plan is to stand a chance, it needs to be a federal/national plan. As you know in NYC, it is impossible to clamp down in one selected area with any degree of effectiveness, as people will just travel outside of the boundary to get their weapons.

I anticipate a push for national legislation against handguns. Not an agenda I'm pushing, but something I fully expect to see.
Personally, I have no issue with the regulation of guns. Require a background check, a license, some training............I really don't care. If such regulations eliminate the random violence because a legal weapon got into the wrong hands, then I'm all for it.

However, responding to this tragedy with the expectation that regulation is the means to stop similar tragedies in the future is the conclusion of a fool.

People would always like to see "something done about it". However, they don't really have a good understanding of what to do and whether what is done will have any good effect.
Reply With Quote
  #349  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:14 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by edge View Post
By Sari Horwitz, Published: December 15

Adam Lanza forced his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School carrying a Glock, a SIG Sauer and a Bushmaster rifle, all legally registered to his mother, law enforcement officials said, and all capable of massive killing power.

He chose the rifle over the two handguns to massacre most of his 26 victims in a matter of minutes, inflicting “devastating” multiple wounds, said Connecticut’s chief medical examiner.

The Washington Post
GRAPHIC | Two of the deadliest massacres happened this year, but 11 others also claimed lives.

Police said that they found “dozens and dozens” of shell casings from .223 high-velocity rounds inside the school, the type of spent casings that come from bullets used in the Bushmaster rifle.

The lightweight .223 bullets travel at a velocity of about 3,000 feet per second, and after they enter their target, they explode throughout the tissue. As the medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II put it at a news conference Saturday, the bullets’ “energy stays in the body.”
Just trying to circumspect/move forward here........pls forgive if my contemplations seem out of place - they're not meant to be, I have been reflecting on the following:

Why the weapons above, registered legally to the murder's dead Mother, were given accessibility to the Son - however remote the possibility?

Why was the Mother not aware that these weapons could possibly be accessed and used by her troubled Son? Did she not know the extent to which the Son was troubled?

Was the Mother not aware of the Son's accumulation of specialized 'storm-trooper' clothing and ammo?

Wasn't the fact that she was a teacher at the school, and apparently well-educated, not a basis to tip her off and make her aware what was potentially possible - given the weapons availabilty to her troubled Son? I'm wondering if it ever crossed her mind the danger in the weapons being available to him.

These are questions that obviously the deceased Mother cannot answer, but my reason for posting these Qs is that there seems to be common signs in the young men that are slaughtering others in recent years.

The Mother was not only the source of the weapons, but she was also intimately involved as a teacher/faculty member where the Son did his murdering.

These terrible, murderous rampages just keep happening. Are there not ppl (family members/parents) that can put the stop to potential future events like Newtown, CT? I think so, if they will just take seriously the behavior in their family members that may be; on-the-edge, or leading in this direction.
__________________
'06 E320 CDI
'17 Corvette Stingray Vert
Reply With Quote
  #350  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:20 PM
elchivito's Avatar
¡Ay Jodido!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rancho Disparates
Posts: 4,075
That parents are often in denial about their own kids while being hyper-critical about others' is pretty obvious. I remember the parents of one of the Columbine perps... claimed to be completely unaware that he was assembling bombs in their own basement.
__________________
You're a daisy if you do.
__________________________________
84 Euro 240D 4spd. 220.5k sold
04 Honda Element AWD
1985 F150 XLT 4x4, 351W with 270k miles, hay hauler
1997 Suzuki Sidekick 4x4
1993 Toyota 4wd Pickup 226K and counting
Reply With Quote
  #351  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:22 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Personally, I have no issue with the regulation of guns. Require a background check, a license, some training............I really don't care. If such regulations eliminate the random violence because a legal weapon got into the wrong hands, then I'm all for it.

However, responding to this tragedy with the expectation that regulation is the means to stop similar tragedies in the future is the conclusion of a fool.

People would always like to see "something done about it". However, they don't really have a good understanding of what to do and whether what is done will have any good effect.
I think the answer to this problem would have been to lock up all known crazy nut jobs that are on the loose before they harm somebody.

I remember passing what my dad used to call the Funny Farm...it was a state facility for the mentally insane. Back in the 1970's, for one reason or another, funding either dried up or somebody was locked away that really wasn't crazy, I don't know...anyway, the facility was shut down and became vacant. About that same time, I remember seeing people walking the streets, talking to themselves when we went downtown. Why did we let so many of them loose on the public??

Today, we have more mentally ill people living amongst the public than we did years ago.

Consequently, we stopped out monthly visit to the river downtown, and stayed within the suburbs after seeing the crazies out on the street...dad told us it was no longer safe downtown.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #352  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe View Post

Wasn't the fact that she was a teacher at the school,
According to news updates his mother had no connection to the school.
As to the other issues. My feeling is that mental illness is not something private individuals are equipped to deal with.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #353  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:42 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 51,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe View Post
Just trying to circumspect/move forward here........pls forgive if my contemplations seem out of place - they're not meant to be, I have been reflecting on the following:

Why the weapons above, registered legally to the murder's dead Mother, were given accessibility to the Son - however remote the possibility?

Why was the Mother not aware that these weapons could possibly be accessed and used by her troubled Son? Did she not know the extent to which the Son was troubled?

Was the Mother not aware of the Son's accumulation of specialized 'storm-trooper' clothing and ammo?

Wasn't the fact that she was a teacher at the school, and apparently well-educated, not a basis to tip her off and make her aware what was potentially possible - given the weapons availabilty to her troubled Son? I'm wondering if it ever crossed her mind the danger in the weapons being available to him.

These are questions that obviously the deceased Mother cannot answer, but my reason for posting these Qs is that there seems to be common signs in the young men that are slaughtering others in recent years.

The Mother was not only the source of the weapons, but she was also intimately involved as a teacher/faculty member where the Son did his murdering.

These terrible, murderous rampages just keep happening. Are there not ppl (family members/parents) that can put the stop to potential future events like Newtown, CT? I think so, if they will just take seriously the behavior in their family members that may be; on-the-edge, or leading in this direction.

I don't think parents ever want to see the bad in their children. Especially not the bad that would allow a child to commit mass murder.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #354  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:47 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 51,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I think the answer to this problem would have been to lock up all known crazy nut jobs that are on the loose before they harm somebody.

I remember passing what my dad used to call the Funny Farm...it was a state facility for the mentally insane. Back in the 1970's, for one reason or another, funding either dried up or somebody was locked away that really wasn't crazy, I don't know...anyway, the facility was shut down and became vacant. About that same time, I remember seeing people walking the streets, talking to themselves when we went downtown. Why did we let so many of them loose on the public??

Today, we have more mentally ill people living amongst the public than we did years ago.

Consequently, we stopped out monthly visit to the river downtown, and stayed within the suburbs after seeing the crazies out on the street...dad told us it was no longer safe downtown.
But we cannot find them all, so why bother?

We cannot infringe on peoples rights (I do not think the COTUS out laws being nuts) so we should not do that.

The arguments used for gun regulations.... why not use them here?
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #355  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
You and your kind are the exact cause of the over-reaction that the government has toward any specific violent incident. Apparently, ensuring that the specific violent incident cannot happen again is satisfactory for you.

This is despite the fact that there are hundreds of possible violent incidents that can occur, and for which the government has failed to address, because they have not happened yet.
Since 9/11 how many commercial airplanes have been brought down in the United States due to terrorism? None.

Since 9/11 how many mass shootings have we had?

Reactive though it may be, the government seems to be doing something right for airline safety.
Reply With Quote
  #356  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by elchivito View Post
I don't know if I would advocate for armed teachers or not, but in her case I understand it. She has been repeatedly threatened by a gang of tough girls. Being latina herself they see her as some sort of sell-out. The fact that she's cute as hell and the boys dig her makes it even worse. Her carrying has become sort of an urban legend on campus now and she's left alone. It would not surprise me if her principal knows too.
It's not legal to concealed carry in a school in CO.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #357  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:56 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I think the answer to this problem would have been to lock up all known crazy nut jobs that are on the loose before they harm somebody.
In your world, greatly simplified, everything is black and white. Simply round up all the crazy nut jobs that might kill someone and lock 'em up. Simple solution.

Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.

In the case of children who might commit violence, there is really no place to put them. They are shuttled to and from the local hospital until they calm down and are fit to be released to the parents. The parents take them home and hope, against all odds, that another "episode" won't occur again.

This process repeats itself time and time and time again. Even if the parent is concerned that the kid might injure someone, no parent will readily agree that the kid might kill someone, and, even if they did, there is no place to send the kid for a permanent solution.

However, once the kid enter the world of the criminal, due to any violence against a third party, there are plenty of facilities that will incarcerate the kid for an extended period of time...........after the crime has been committed.
Reply With Quote
  #358  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:58 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
It's not legal to concealed carry in a school in CO.
It should be. It is in Utah. It will be in TX, specifically for teachers and educators...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,404721,00.html?fb_action_ids=4814923778247&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=timeline_og&action_object_map={%224814923778247%22%3A10150146251722783}&action_type_map={%224814923778247%22%3A%22og.likes%22}&action_ref_map=[]

Quote:
A tiny Texas school district may be the first in the nation to pass a law specifically allowing teachers and staff to pack heat when classes begin later this month.
Trustees at the Harrold Independent School District approved a district policy change last October so employees can carry concealed firearms to deter and protect against school shootings, provided the gun-toting teachers follow certain requirements.
Superintendent David Thweatt told FOXNews.com the policy was initiated because of safety concerns.
"We have had employees assaulted before by people in the last several years," Thweatt said. "I think that safety is big concern. We are seeing a lot of anger in society."
He wouldn't comment further on the nature of the assaults.
The Texas superintendent linked gun-free zones with the uprising of school shootings in recent years.
"When you make schools gun-free zones, it's like inviting people to come in and take advantage," Thweatt told FOXNews.com.
In order for teachers and staff to carry a pistol, they must have a Texas license to carry a concealed handgun; must be authorized to carry by the district; must receive training in crisis management and hostile situations and must use ammunition that is designed to minimize the risk of ricochet in school halls.
Thweatt said the small community is a 30-minute drive from the sheriff's office, leaving students and teachers without protection. He said the district's lone campus sits 500 feet from heavily trafficked U.S. 287, which could make it a target.
The kindergarten through 12th grade school district is home to 110 students.
Thweatt said officials researched the policy and considered other options for about a year before approving the policy change. He said the district also has various other security measures in place to prevent a school shooting.
"The naysayers think [a shooting] won't happen here," Thweatt said. "If something were to happen here, I'd much rather be calling a parent to tell them that their child is OK because we were able to protect them."
He told FOXNews.com he doesn't think students will think twice about the new policy.
"I hope they forget all about it," he said. "We want them to pay attention [to their school work]."
Texas law outlaws firearms on school campuses "unless pursuant to the written regulations or written authorization of the institution."
While the district's plan shot them into the national spotlight, carrying guns to school is nothing new some states. In Utah, the law allows anyone with a permit to carry a gun in public schools and state institutions of higher education.
It was unclear how many of the 50 or so teachers and staff members will be armed this fall because Thweatt did not disclose that information, to keep it from students or potential attackers.
Wilbarger County Sheriff Larry Lee did not immediately return a call placed to his office by FOXNews.com.
Barbara Williams, a spokeswoman for the Texas Association of School Boards, said her organization did not know of another district with such a policy. Ken Trump, a Cleveland-based school security expert who advises districts nationwide, including in Texas, said Harrold is the first district with such a policy.
The district is 150 miles northwest of Fort Worth on the eastern end of Wilbarger County, near the Oklahoma border.
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #359  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:59 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,925
Two things...

my daughter the pediatrician seems to think the shooter may have had asbergers and spent his days playing shootemup games.

I think I read that his mom was neither a teacher or an employee of the school.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #360  
Old 12-16-2012, 11:59 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyb View Post
Since 9/11 how many commercial airplanes have been brought down in the United States due to terrorism? None.

Since 9/11 how many mass shootings have we had?

Reactive though it may be, the government seems to be doing something right for airline safety.
The lack of any terrorist attacks against an aircraft is your answer to the government introducing legislation against mass shootings?



Nice argument.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page