Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton
Since you selectively quoted a fraction of my previous response to try to support your lame position, you'll get no further argument from me.
Your plan to restrict gun ownership will get minimal traction, if any, and no reduction in random violence committed against unarmed assembled groups will ever occur.
CT already has one of the strictest gun laws in the country, a fact for which you ignore conveniently. It had no effect whatsoever.
There were some excellent ideas presented on this thread by Peter and Dubya...........too bad you didn't read them.
|
cowardly, but I guess that goes well with doing nothing. You don't treat other people with respect when talking to them, don't expect respect back, seems you shouldn't have so much trouble understanding that. You seem like a smart guy, and on other subjects we have agreed many times, but even a smart guy could do well to learn some manners. Why not try?
CT does have some of the toughest gun laws in the country, id be happy if they are tougher.
I quoted the first section sure, the rest was more obnoxious attacking and doing nothing.
I have read their ideas, and no, I don't think a police state is a good idea, sorry. Other of their points I agree with.