Quote:
Originally Posted by dropnosky
It didn't, they are dead.
However, when timmy the put upon 17 year old goes ape and wants to off his classmates with his dads 45, only to find that its gone as part of Mr. Dropnosky's laws, and he doesn't know how to get a gun, so chooses some other method that results in less people killed or no deaths at all, maybe rules of the kind I am proposing would have some value to you.
No solution will solve all the problems Brian, but it might do you good to actually consider ideas even if reprehensible to you for their potential merits, even if not complete and total for all uses of weapons.
|
Exactly.
The scenario that you indicated is realistic and, if you could eliminate all handguns, including dads target shooting .45, your proposed solution would have merit to eliminate the very narrow scenario that you stated above.
I've certainly considered your idea and the idea itself is not reprehensible to me. Because you're unable to read what I post and process it, I'll say it again.........this time in bold:
I couldn't care less if Mr. Dropnosky's laws resulted in the elimination of all automatic handguns because in this state, I cannot legally carry one anyway.
The problem with your proposal is that it is a pipe dream. It's about as unrealistic as you could possible get in this country. Nobody is going to go for anything that restricts their ability to own a firearm. You'd be lucky to get gun registration in place in every state of the union. So, I wish you'd kindly quit with these over the top recommendations that have absolutely no basis in reality.
Like I originally said............"you and your kind"............all kinds of proposals...........all of them basically worthless
in this society.
12-18-2012, 12:08 PM
Threaded Mode
