Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2010, 06:48 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc

G'day Folks,

What with these freezing short days and all (in the Northern hemisphere) I've been messing about making gucci drawings of my new camshaft profile on my 1981 OM617.

I've made some measurements and using a CAD package I've worked out the lift of the cam at 10 degree intervals. I've attached my results in case they are of use to others - may be there is a cam expert out there?

Anyway here's the question - does anyone have an official source for this sort of information?

I'd like to check my measurements.

I've got the latest code 11 cam (successor of the 00 - but probably has the same shape).
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617_cam_dimensions.jpeg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf OM617 camshaft dimensions.pdf (18.1 KB, 465 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2010, 07:05 AM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Interesting piece of work Army.
It doesnt look quite right though.
You will see the sides of the lobe look as though they are approaching being slightly concave. There should be slightly more metal in those regions. The cam that you have drawn would be prone to valve bounce.

I have no idea where you would get the original spec on the cam.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2010, 07:43 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by layback40 View Post
Interesting piece of work Army.
It doesnt look quite right though.
You will see the sides of the lobe look as though they are approaching being slightly concave. There should be slightly more metal in those regions. The cam that you have drawn would be prone to valve bounce.

I have no idea where you would get the original spec on the cam.
Thanks for the response it is a bit rough - I know - I based my drawing on two circles and two tangential lines... the tangential lines start and stop at the same height but their positions are done by eye. So I know it isn't accurate enough.

If I still had the kit I'd use a finely pulsed tachometer and a LVDT to make a time capture measurement of the cam's surface at very slow rotations. But I don't work at a university anymore...
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2010, 01:52 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Update

I'm going to have to 'do it the old fashioned' way. I'm going to measure the lift from the camshaft with a DTI...

I have found some good graphing software that can interpolate between the measured points for me. I've attached the result set showing the data in the PDF file in my first post.



Strange - I've just noticed that the X-axis values have been decimated - Oh well I'm gonna have to check on that...
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-output-camshaft-estimation.jpeg  
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Last edited by Stretch; 12-19-2010 at 01:54 PM. Reason: Just noticed
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2010, 05:28 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
I was thinking about this yesterday--What if people made a performance cams for the benz like they probably do for the cummins.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2010, 01:36 PM
DeliveryValve's Avatar
Chairman of my Benz
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central California
Posts: 4,159
Colt Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by panZZer View Post
I was thinking about this yesterday--What if people made a performance cams for the benz like they probably do for the cummins.
At the beginning of this year I got in contact with Geoff Bardal at Colt Cams in Aldergrove, British Columbia Canada. I was led to his company through the Volkswagen TDI circle in which he makes a performance TDI profile that people have had good reviews on. He also has done thousands of profiles on various gas and diesel applications and has also done extensive work on the Cummins 5.9L diesel.

I called him to price out a profile for my own TDI. While on the phone, I asked him about a performance profile for the OM617.95x and said he has one that he did back in the 1990’s in which his customer was happy. He has not done one recently, but is experienced in the OM61x since has been to regrind or repaired several to factory specs.

After a little discussion of varying applications the 617 is being used in our circle, he thinks there is a lot of capacity to get more performance out of the 617 cam, even more so then his earlier profile.

He is very interested in the working with 617 folks to create custom grind for each custom use. He offered me for about $340 shipped, a custom grind that he will work with me to get it right, provided that I get him a cam to regrind. I think this a great idea but unfortunately for my engine, I still want to make other mods i.e. different turbo and IP mod.

However, I do think it is important to get some R&D in and if somebody who is further along then I am or is looking to improve on the stock setup, should contact him or even Delta and get a project going. The more profiles available, the better for all of us.


http://www.coltcams.com/


Colt Cams Inc.
2325 264th street
Aldergrove BC V4W 2L5
Canada


Phone: 604-856-3571
Fax: 604-856-3572





.
__________________
1983 123.133 California
- GreaseCar Veg System



Last edited by DeliveryValve; 12-20-2010 at 03:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-19-2010, 10:35 PM
4x4_Welder's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 504
I have had good luck with Delta Camshaft of Tacoma, WA with gasser cams, I'm actually running one of their regrinds in my van right now. It might be worthwhile to contact them and see what they could do with an OM617 cam.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2010, 03:38 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
I was thinking last night that there is also a bit of a strange relationship between the cam and the cam follower - it slides all over the place. So I'm gonna see if I can measure the movement at the valve as well.

At the moment it is so cold (and humid) here I can't paint my engine bay so I may as well fill in my time with a bit of research.

The operational clearance - the movement of pistons and valves - in these engines is somewhat scary compared with petrol engines.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-22-2011, 08:06 AM
vstech's Avatar
DD MOD, HVAC,MCP,Mac,GMAC
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 27,015
ok
__________________
John HAUL AWAY, OR CRUSHED CARS!!! HELP ME keep the cars out of the crusher! A/C Thread
"as I ride with my a/c on... I have fond memories of sweaty oily saturdays and spewing R12 into the air. THANKS for all you do!

My drivers:
1987 190D 2.5Turbo
1987 560SL convertible
1987 190D 2.5-5SPEED!!!

1987 300TD
2005 Dodge Sprinter 2500 158"WB
1994GMC 2500 6.5Turbo truck... I had to put the ladder somewhere!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-22-2011, 08:13 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by vstech View Post
ok
Thanks for the thread rename John - it explains a bit more about the content now!
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-09-2011, 03:59 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
For a different problem I measured the positions of the cam lobes

Here is data for the position of the cam lobes.

I've only got a 150mm vernier caliper so they are not as good as they could be - there is an accumulative error in the summation of the individual distances for the new cam shaft - the old one I've got worked out better - that was pure luck!
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Distances between lobes on OM617 camshafts.pdf (35.7 KB, 347 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-27-2011, 01:48 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
I've made some mistakes with this...

...that I'd like to correct.

In post 20 I've got the clearance wrong.

The clearance was measured directly as described in the post.

I measured the "drop" of the valve from its position in the valve seat to the piston crown. This was:-

Inlet (cylinder #1) 3.18mm
Exhaust (cylinder #1) 2.88mm

This is the clearance.

I was trying to find out how thick the head gasket was when fitted... I'm interested in this because the piston on my engine sticks out above the surface of the block by 0.85mm. The head gasket is the only thing that stops disaster!


This roughly drawn picture above is meant to show that the valves are recessed into the head.

In my engine they were:-

Inlet (cylinder #1) 1.05 mm
Exhaust (cylinder #1) 0.8 mm

The recess in the piston crown was measured to be 1.25mm



So adding the distance of the recess in the crown of the piston to the depth at which the valves have been recessed into the head you get

Inlet (cylinder #1) 1.05 mm + 1.25mm = 2.3 mm
Exhaust (cylinder #1) 0.8 mm + 1.25mm = 2.05 mm

So subtracting the combined values of the recesses the distance between the top of the piston and the head is either

Inlet (cylinder #1) 3.18 mm - 2.3 mm = 0.88mm

or

Exhaust (cylinder #1) 2.88 mm - 2.05 mm = 0.83mm

As said before 0.05mm has been "lost" some where in the measuring process. This is equal to the precision of my depth gauge...

So after all that I can estimate my head gasket thickness when fitted to be somewhere between 1.68 mm and 1.73mm on a cold engine! The uncompressed head gasket thickness was 2.2mm.

So a head gasket seems to be compressed by about 20% of its thickness when fitted.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-valve-piston-clearance.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-non-turbo-piston.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf OM617 non turbo cam measurements.pdf (23.9 KB, 299 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Last edited by Stretch; 11-27-2011 at 02:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-28-2011, 04:45 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Timing chain elongation calculations

I've been wondering about the odd numbers of offset correction for timing chain elongation described in the FSM (chap 5-215). I've done some calculations that suggest that the smallest offset key is pretty useless...

Well it is pretty useless to correct for 4 degrees - it is better for 6!

Take a look at this image of the PDF I've attached.



The diameter of the hole in the camshaft sprocket on my OM617 non turbo is most definitely 28mm - but it looks like Mercedes have designed the offset keys for a 30mm diameter. Does anyone know if the turbo cam has a 30mm diameter hole in the camshaft sprocket?



And the size of the Woodruff key / offset key slot is 4mm



I've measured the PCD of the camshaft sprocket and I reckon it is 119mm. I've used this value to calculate the circumference of a "circle" running around the sprocket where I expect the chain to be resting. This circumference was then proportionally divided up for each angle of elongation => i.e. circumference of PCD circle divided by 360 degrees multiplied by "degree of elongation at camshaft sprocket"



It is nice to see that roughly speaking if you have one degree of elongation measured at the crank that is equivalent to about 0.5mm linear elongation.
Attached Thumbnails
OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617chainelongation.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-camshaft-sprocket2.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-camshaft-cog-woodruff-key-width.jpg   OM617 (non turbo) cam profile specs, piston height specs etc-om617-camshaft-cog-inner-diameter.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf OM617chainelongation.pdf (16.1 KB, 335 views)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!

Last edited by Stretch; 11-28-2011 at 05:11 AM. Reason: I made a correction
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page