Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 04-22-2021, 11:22 AM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselbenz1 View Post
I had experienced the exact same with a smaller diameter hose. Increasing the hose diameter increased the vacuum and reduced the crankcase pressures. No more leaks.
Increased the vacuum??

__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-22-2021, 11:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,087
The turbo sucks the vapors out of the valve cover via negative pressure or vacuum.
__________________
92 e300d2.5t
01 e320
05 cdi
85 chev c10
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-22-2021, 11:48 AM
ykobayashi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,415
Ditto on what everyone is saying. Pipe flow resistance is dealt with by increasing pipe diameter. I’ve been out of school too long...the flow is either proportional to the diameter or the square of the diameter. Basically you want a big diameter pipe. Bigger the better. Maybe more extreme if the flow is turbulent...again I cannot remember.

The pressure drop is also proportional to the length of the pipe. Like breathing through a garden hose as a kid underwater...tried that once. Long tubes = lower flow.

The right angle back pressure happens because of friction and inertia. You’re radically changing the direction of the flow with a right angle.

Shern - your first separator has a sintered filter in it. Depending on its porosity it’s going to create more or less restriction to the flow. The second has tiny nipples. Those don’t look good at all.

One thing I got right on my salsa jar design was big diameter tubes (same as OE breather) and no baffling. I just used a credit card to separate input and output and stuffed the bottle with Brillo. My flaw is that the tubes are long. It was hard finding a convenient place to hang the bottle.

The really fancy industrial condensers from Parker Hannifin use Brillo and giant volumes. I think they try to cool the can to encourage condensation.

This is really a bandaid on both of my cars. I may be wrong but I think I’m due for some valve stem seals on both. It has been discussed here that the turbos have more exhaust back pressure that will come back through the exhaust valve guides on tired engines. Even though the stem seals aren’t supposed to hold back blowby I suspect having fresh ones can only reduce gases that slip by the exhaust valve guides. Next valve adjustment I’ll swap mine. I have them sitting on my shelf staring at me.

Yeah that blow by meter was an education. the oil separators and drains were our competitive edge. Most of the other players in the market would have their sensor fill up with oil after a week on the dyno.
__________________
79 300TD “Old Smokey” AKA “The Mistake” (SOLD)
82 240D stick shift 335k miles (SOLD)
82 300SD 300k miles
85 300D Turbodiesel 170k miles
97 C280 147k miles

Last edited by ykobayashi; 04-22-2021 at 12:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-22-2021, 11:54 AM
ykobayashi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselbenz1 View Post
The turbo sucks the vapors out of the valve cover via negative pressure or vacuum.
Good point. I didn’t think of that.

Still I think it’s a good idea to keep the separator’s flow restriction down. There’s a point where the restriction can get so high it doesn’t matter how much you pull vacuum...depends on how well the separator is designed. Some have really small nipples. That’s why I picked the BMW n54 style.

This one:
https://www.amazon.com/NovelBee-Polished-Aluminum-Engine-Reservoir/dp/B088CT74CD/ref=sr_1_8?crid=HTKA5TUU9HSJ&dchild=1&keywords=bmw+n54+oil+catch+can&qid=1619107807&sprefix=BMW+n54+oil%2Caps%2C229&sr=8-8
__________________
79 300TD “Old Smokey” AKA “The Mistake” (SOLD)
82 240D stick shift 335k miles (SOLD)
82 300SD 300k miles
85 300D Turbodiesel 170k miles
97 C280 147k miles

Last edited by ykobayashi; 04-22-2021 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-22-2021, 12:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,087
Yes it is important not to restrict flow doing so increases crank case pressure and you will notice leaks.
__________________
92 e300d2.5t
01 e320
05 cdi
85 chev c10
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-22-2021, 12:43 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykobayashi View Post
Ditto on what everyone is saying. Pipe flow resistance is dealt with by increasing pipe diameter. I’ve been out of school too long...the flow is either proportional to the diameter or the square of the diameter. Basically you want a big diameter pipe. Bigger the better. Maybe more extreme if the flow is turbulent...again I cannot remember.

The pressure drop is also proportional to the length of the pipe. Like breathing through a garden hose as a kid underwater...tried that once. Long tubes = lower flow.

The right angle back pressure happens because of friction and inertia. You’re radically changing the direction of the flow with a right angle.

Shern - your first separator has a sintered filter in it. Depending on its porosity it’s going to create more or less restriction to the flow. The second has tiny nipples. Those don’t look good at all.

.
This is a fantastic explanation –thank you.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dieselbenz1 View Post
The turbo sucks the vapors out of the valve cover via negative pressure or vacuum.
Understood, thank you. As I'm running an NA engine, I assume I am only experiencing positive pressure from the crankcase?
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-22-2021, 12:46 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by ykobayashi View Post
Good point. I didn’t think of that.

Still I think it’s a good idea to keep the separator’s flow restriction down. There’s a point where the restriction can get so high it doesn’t matter how much you pull vacuum...depends on how well the separator is designed. Some have really small nipples. That’s why I picked the BMW n54 style.

This one:
https://www.amazon.com/NovelBee-Polished-Aluminum-Engine-Reservoir/dp/B088CT74CD/ref=sr_1_8?crid=HTKA5TUU9HSJ&dchild=1&keywords=bmw+n54+oil+catch+can&qid=1619107807&sprefix=BMW+n54+oil%2Caps%2C229&sr=8-8
3/4" nipples on this one. I think that's even more than the stock breather... Interesting.

Some of these come with breathers, which seems like a good idea for increased airflow, though I can't understand how that wouldn't muck up your engine bay over time.

e.g.: This guy
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-22-2021, 01:33 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,924
And here's another interesting option...

This one has 25mm nipple/inlets. It seems to be a knockoff of another catch can called the Mann Pro-vent 200, which seemed to have been installed in a few of our cars. I found a few cryptic references to it in the archives.
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-22-2021, 02:35 PM
Dubyagee's Avatar
All fields are required
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE
Posts: 7,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shern View Post
And here's another interesting option...

This one has 25mm nipple/inlets. It seems to be a knockoff of another catch can called the Mann Pro-vent 200, which seemed to have been installed in a few of our cars. I found a few cryptic references to it in the archives.


That looks similar to the unit I took from a blown tier 4 final Kubota diesel. Mine has a filter and screen media in it.
__________________
Satan creates nothing: he only ruins everything. He does not invent: he tampers. And his followers are no different ~ Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-22-2021, 11:50 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,924
Not sure about you turbo chaps, but the breather hose on my 616 has an internal diameter of about 12.35mm (about half an inch). The outer diameter came in at about 15.24mm.

That should expand our options.

One possible issue with the “Mann provent” is that it appears to require a line to the sump.
Mounting another catch-can in lieu of the sump I think is just a little too ridiculous even for me.

Ykobayashi- given your physics tutorial, longer lines->more air to displace ->more back pressure. I’m considering drilling two screw holes into the air cleaner housing and mounting it right there.

Any flaws in my logic?



.
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-23-2021, 01:54 AM
vwnate1's Avatar
Diesel Dandy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sunny So. Cal. !
Posts: 7,811
Exclamation Hose I.D.

The images all show significantly smaller hose I.D. and that's simply never going to work well .

The factory breather hose is 12MM I.D. and all the Amazon ones are speced to be 10MM, not going to work .

Shern, you and I really need to meet so you can eyeball my old battered '82 240D and see real world oil weeps and seeps on an engine that's run hard daily .
__________________
-Nate
1982 240D 408,XXX miles
Ignorance is the mother of suspicion and fear is the father

I did then what I knew how to do ~ now that I know better I do better
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-23-2021, 06:35 AM
ykobayashi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shern View Post
Mounting another catch-can in lieu of the sump I think is just a little too ridiculous even for me.

Ykobayashi- given your physics tutorial, longer lines->more air to displace ->more back pressure. I’m considering drilling two screw holes into the air cleaner housing and mounting it right there.

Any flaws in my logic?

.
Pretty brilliant actually. This is what the Mb engineers did on my W126. They put the separator in the air cleaner. On my 240d the separator was positioned at the front of the engine between the valve cover and intake. It was positioned well.

I wouldn’t worry about rigging a sump. Hmmm, I think my 240d had one. Yeah, foggy but I recall putting a cork in it when I removed the entire contraption. If you don’t have the plumbing just empty periodically. That’s why I do on my current cars.

Odd...I recall now mine bolted on to two nice m6 bosses on my intake manifold right at the #1 runner. You don’t have this mount? Mine self destructed and leaked hence I removed it. Edit - no my memory is foggy...maybe there was a bracket around the thermostat housing. I recall there was a mount.

Here’s what mine looked like before the delete.
https://www.benzworld.org/attachments/img_5456-jpg.2664308/
__________________
79 300TD “Old Smokey” AKA “The Mistake” (SOLD)
82 240D stick shift 335k miles (SOLD)
82 300SD 300k miles
85 300D Turbodiesel 170k miles
97 C280 147k miles

Last edited by ykobayashi; 04-23-2021 at 06:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-23-2021, 01:03 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwnate1 View Post
The images all show significantly smaller hose I.D. and that's simply never going to work well .

The factory breather hose is 12MM I.D. and all the Amazon ones are speced to be 10MM, not going to work .

Shern, you and I really need to meet so you can eyeball my old battered '82 240D and see real world oil weeps and seeps on an engine that's run hard daily .
You're right about that. I measured the hose in the post right above you but the last two catch cans are 3/4" input/output so they'll be fine.

I'd love to compare to 240s! You let me know where and I'll be there.
I'll show you what an obsessively degreased, non-leaky 616 looks like.
I too run mine hard daily but I also sweat the details I probably shouldn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ykobayashi View Post
Pretty brilliant actually. This is what the Mb engineers did on my W126. They put the separator in the air cleaner. On my 240d the separator was positioned at the front of the engine between the valve cover and intake. It was positioned well.

I wouldn’t worry about rigging a sump. Hmmm, I think my 240d had one. Yeah, foggy but I recall putting a cork in it when I removed the entire contraption. If you don’t have the plumbing just empty periodically. That’s why I do on my current cars.

Odd...I recall now mine bolted on to two nice m6 bosses on my intake manifold right at the #1 runner. You don’t have this mount? Mine self destructed and leaked hence I removed it. Edit - no my memory is foggy...maybe there was a bracket around the thermostat housing. I recall there was a mount.

Here’s what mine looked like before the delete.
https://www.benzworld.org/attachments/img_5456-jpg.2664308/
I don't have this mount or manifold... It's close, but the breather tube hole on my manifold is on the engine side of the air-cleaner.

Seems like good practice putting some steel wool in these things? I can't say I totally understand the varying baffle systems, but I do understand giving hot vapors a place to condense.

Are there any issues with gas temperatures/hose materials?
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-23-2021, 03:20 PM
ykobayashi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,415
I use stainless steel pot scrubby from Walmart. I think it’s 3M brand. It is basically a continuous chip so it only has two ends. I think this is important because I don’t want that stuff breaking off and going into the intake. Super durable stuff made to be scrunched up and manhandled.

I notice some people use the copper stuff too. It seems to help coalesce the oil without having a lot of flow restriction.

Don’t use steel wool. Spring for the $2 pot scrubby.

I use this. https://www.walmart.com/ip/Scotch-Brite-Stainless-Steel-Scrubbing-Pads-3-Pack/13281617

I think I used 2. I kind of stretch them out to fluff them up so to speak.
__________________
79 300TD “Old Smokey” AKA “The Mistake” (SOLD)
82 240D stick shift 335k miles (SOLD)
82 300SD 300k miles
85 300D Turbodiesel 170k miles
97 C280 147k miles
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-23-2021, 09:43 PM
vwnate1's Avatar
Diesel Dandy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sunny So. Cal. !
Posts: 7,811
Exclamation Oil Separator Picture

WOW! .

I wish my 20D looked like that ! .

I try hard but dang man .

Shern, zip me an E-Mail and we'll get together and compare 240's .

Mine isn't much these days but God knows, I love it to death .

__________________
-Nate
1982 240D 408,XXX miles
Ignorance is the mother of suspicion and fear is the father

I did then what I knew how to do ~ now that I know better I do better
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page