Boeing 777 crashes while landing at SFO | www.ktvu.com

Either someone in maintenance did something boneheaded or the pilot really stuffed up the landing and struck the tail. Hope everyone got out OK.

I've been watching this by accident, so's to speak, my youngest son was due to fly out of SFO at 4 this afternoon to return to Tucson. I was checking on weather conditions when the first reports came in.

He was over visiting my oldest son and he hasn't exactly had a great vacation. Between the BART strike and now this his transportation schedule has been chaotic to say the least!

It looks pretty encouraging for the passengers on the plane. So far they haven't announced any fatalities and I'm hoping there aren't any.

__________________
“Whatever story you're telling, it will be more interesting if, at the end you add, "and then everything burst into flames.”
― Brian P. Cleary, You Oughta Know By Now

Unfortunately it seems there have been fatalities. Though not in large numbers fortunately.

- Peter.

__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S

It almost looks as if it caught the rocks on landing...as if they were too low coming in.

__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles

Pilot was too low and hit the seawall. There's wreckage in the water and a debris trail all the way back that includes at least one of the main landing gear.

Amazing that only two people died. They were on the runway, so they must somehow have been ejected (perhaps not wearing their seat belts?).

Flight attendants sitting way in the back near the tail?

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13

A 777 doesn't like a 120 kt. approach.

I believe I explained this to you already:

You can't fix stupid.

Let's see what the investigation says. Mechanical failure is a possibility.

Anything is a possibility.

Bet you lunch that it's pilot error..................

I gotta agree with you on this one Brian. The approach into that runway can be visually deceptive. Reports seem to indicate fog had just recently cleared.

__________________
“Whatever story you're telling, it will be more interesting if, at the end you add, "and then everything burst into flames.”
― Brian P. Cleary, You Oughta Know By Now

Look at the trail of debris all the way back to the sea wall. I suspect it is giong to come out pilot error because of low approach.

__________________
Jim

Similar 'landing' short of the threshold at LHR was ice pellets in the RR engine fuel supply.

Not always PE.


.

__________________
[http://languageandgrammar.com/2008/01/14/youve-got-problems-not-issues/ ]

"A liberal is someone who feels they owe a great debt to their fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money."

Bet you lunch that it's PE.

You in?

My friend Spud ran away like a scared chicken.............all hat...........no cattle.

Yeah, that's it! Ice pellets over San Francisco Bay in July!

Look folks. The NTSB has already released the most important information in the info from the flight recorders. It tells the story that allows for a conclusion that is probably 99% accurate. They allowed it to get low and slow. That's it. The rest of the investigation is formality.

The only thing left to determine is the exact procedural issue that led to it.

__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution

If I understood some commentary on CNN correctly, one of those flight tracking websites indicated that the airspeed was down to about 109 knots around the time of landing. Looks like a few folks in the cabin were having a mental siesta...