|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.driftingstreet.com/drift-cars.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Rear_wheel_drive_vehicles http://www.rearwheeldrive.org/rwd/rwdlist.html But wait for it http://www.iseecars.com/cars/rwd-manual-transmission-cars
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I posted this somewhere else, but photobucketed it so I could put it in this thread also-
heres a domestic NV3500 S-10 tranny, with a 123 chassis 5-speed in the middle, and a 115 chassis 4-speed on the bottom. The shift linkage for the two MB trannys would put the shifter about 8-10 inches beyond the NV tranny, right about where the NV tailcone ends I think. If you were to get the NV into your MB, the stick would come up somewhere under the climate control in other words. I have an older late 80s chevy transmission out of a van which is closer to the MB size, and also has a positionable shifter, ill get a pic on that later on, but if it could go straight back it could possibly work. Some kind of Tremec variant. Its actually a 5-speed out of an Astro minivan, so just about as rare as a 123 5-speed. But the transmission might be common to late 80s chevy products, I have to run some numbers
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
MG5 NV3500 4.016 2.318 1.401 1.000 0.729
M50 NV3500 3.490 2.160 1.400 1.000 0.780 MB/Getrag 4-speeds A 3.90-2.30-1.41-1.00 B 3.91-2.32-1.42-1.00 C 4.23-2.36-1.49-1.00 D 3.91-2.17-1.37-1.00 E 3.98-2.29-1.45-1.00 Getrag 5-speed 3.82-2.20-1.40-1.00-0.81 If you were to make the M50-NV work, you would need a 3.69-3.46 diff to keep 1st and 5th gears usable. The MG5 wouldn't work with the OM617's torque band, 5th would lug the engine under 75mph with anything higher than a 3.69 and that would make 1st a useless granny gear. Doh, you're right. Those are for the 250 and 280E models. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have been keeping an eye out on German Ebay. There was a few of these months ago. I contacted the sellers, but no luck. But thanks anyway Forced Induction.
As for other engineers out there, I contacted some folks up in WI or MI -- I forget -- and they do a conversion with a common Chevy 5 speed. They actually list their product conversion for the OM617.952 engine on their web page. They only sell the plate and the plate was a bundle. I called them and they indicated that they have nothing to do with anything else in the conversion. By email, they pointed out the obvious, e.g., need linkage, flywheel, driveshaft, et cet. So, assuming that Forced Induction is correct, sticking with MB parts may be cheaper in the long run. Not sure, however, since I cannot locate a Getrag 717.400 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For $1000 you'd have a known working combo that practically falls in place (and if you find a euro 5-speed 300D it will literally fall into place) compared to a jumble of custom parts and 100+ hours hours planning/fabricating. And with all that custom stuff you'd likely spend more than $1000 or end up saving a few hundred at most. It all depends on your resources and if you would truly enjoy the work. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey Forced Induction,
Would you be interested in the above if I offered you a finder's fee? I don't know, 10-15% assuming the $850 is in the ball park. I can handle the drive shaft cut on my own. Obviously, I would handle the shipping costs. Please let me know. Thanks. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
HA! If I had $1000 lying around I'd have spent it already.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
At least if you acted as my "buying agent", you would have at least 10-15% towards your purchase of the elusive Getrag 717.400 manual 5 speed transmission.... LOL
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is possible to also modify a W201 tranny to fit. I did this with decent success for my 240, but it was about the same price and more time invested than just sourcing a euro transmission. After about 10-12 thousand miles I took it out, took it apart, and its now destined for my 115 behind a turbo 617.
http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/Thread-How-to-adapt-a-W201-5-speed-to-OM616-OM617-applications The 717.411, .410, and .412 are all slightly different W201 boxes that might work However, all three are way less robust looking than the .400 I also have. (sourced actually the long way around from FI, who originally pulled it!) The 717.400 has what appears to me to be larger, better synchros, larger gears overall, and seems heavier duty. The one I have is potentially blown though. (Reason I have it cheap). Im trying to figure out how to take it apart currently, only made it as far as overdrive inside.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, a VERY early production model. Serial number 000 039 from a 280E. Too bad it had internal water damage too $$$ to recover, I would have liked to keep it.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Its tricky, because of its rarity, and also because of less than complete disassembly instructions (I printed the diagram from the EPC), Im super reluctant to use any force to try and get it apart For instance, its really hard to tell from the EPC how the overdrive gear is removed. If it was anything like the W201 boxes, it should just slide off once the sychro is disassembled, but it looks like it needs to be a puller of slide hammer that will remove it. Its completely different Originally I was thinking I could replace the bad gears I found with spare parts from several blown 412s and 410s I have, but the overall size of the internal gearset seems to be larger.
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
All I have is the 716 manual.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is just me thinking out loud. I've always thought the Toyota transmission might be the route to go if you were to try and put a non MB transmission in the car.
The reasons I've thought this would work is because I've seen adapter plates for mounting the 617 to the Toyota trans. But the bell housing is also removable, as is the bell housing on the iron box MB 4 speeds. I've seen Toyota transmission adapted to other bell housings. meaning there are a few options to make the adaptation to the MB engine. Also the transmission is long, and the shifter is at the very end of the transmission. ![]() Plus Toyota used these transmissions in everything, from trucks to Supras, so they made adapters to relocated the shifter based on the application. ![]() I know I've seen threads about these transmissions getting mated to MB diesels going into Toyota trucks. Has anyone ever thought of putting the Toyota transmission into the MB car?
__________________
1983 Toyota Tercel 4WD Wagon - 1984 Mercedes-Benz 300SD 4-Speed(My Car!) 2005 C230 Kompressor 6-Speed Manual
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Plus it looks like the starter bump is in exactly the right place! Now you have me keeping my eye open for a toyota transmission of that vintage
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|