Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 12-14-2012, 05:43 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graplr View Post
If no person were allowed to legally purchase a handgun/assault rifle, it sure as hell would have been a lot harder for him to steal one.

I'm on the fence on this one but definitely wouldn't mind having an open discussion about the positives about gun restrictions. I own a rifle, a shotgun and a bow and arrow. My favorite to hunt with is the bow. I have no desire to own a handgun or assault rifle. I think there needs to be a long hard discussion on this subject.

Obviously the person is to blame, not the gun. I don't have the answers but I do think it is time to start the discussion to find a solution.

Japan has some of the toughest restrictions on guns in the world. Here is a quote- "In 2008, the U.S. had over 12 thousand firearm-related homicides. All of Japan experienced only 11, fewer than were killed at the Aurora shooting alone."
A Land Without Guns: How Japan Has Virtually Eliminated Shooting Deaths - Max Fisher - The Atlantic
With that thinking, we should also ban the automobile...32,000 died in automobile related deaths in 2011

2011 traffic deaths a record low | Reuters


You can't compare US deaths with Japan's deaths...two different societies. The kids here aren't taught to respect each other or their elders like they are in Japan.

You can't compare either country...they have 127M people compared to our 311M people.

__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-14-2012, 05:45 PM
Graplr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rapier View Post
On the other hand:

"In 2009, the number of suicides rose 2 percent to 32,845 exceeding 30,000 for the twelfth straight year and equating to nearly 26 suicides per 100,000 people.

This amounts to approximately one suicide every 15 minutes. In comparison, the UK rate is about 9 per 100,000, and the US rate around 11 per 100,000"

Suicide in Japan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So you are saying that if we had tougher gun regulation in the US, the suicide rate would go up?

BTW, I didn't say gun control was the answer. But definitely should be explored and discussed.
__________________
2009 ML320 Bluetec
1985 300CD
1981 300TD


Past Mercedes
1979 300TD
1982 300TD
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1998 E430
1984 300SD
1980 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-14-2012, 05:52 PM
Graplr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
With that thinking, we should also ban the automobile...32,000 died in automobile related deaths in 2011

2011 traffic deaths a record low | Reuters
JP, you are barking up the wrong tree here. A car is not designed to kill things. A gun is. People don't drive a car with an intent to kill another person. When a person loads a gun, points it at another human and pulls the trigger they intend to kill that person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
You can't compare US deaths with Japan's deaths...two different societies. The kids here aren't taught to respect each other or their elders like they are in Japan.

You can't compare either country...they have 127M people compared to our 311M people.
You are right. 12,000 to 311 million is no comparison to 11 to 127 million in a country the size of Montana.
BTW, I didn't say this was the answer, just something to think about as you are correct that we are two very different countries.


I take it you are 100% against regulating guns in any fashion at all?
__________________
2009 ML320 Bluetec
1985 300CD
1981 300TD


Past Mercedes
1979 300TD
1982 300TD
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1998 E430
1984 300SD
1980 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,923
Copycat kind of thing I wonder? Media diseminates the news in such a way they may almost popularise some behaviours. Self elimination or suicide is not allowed to be reported in the news as such .It was proven or is known incidents increase as a direct result of the reporting.

He could have shot his mother at home. Hard to find any rationality in these things. Part of it may also be cultural.

There have been enough of this type of incident that armed guards at schools could become mandated further increasing educational costs. There is no sound way to weed out disturbed self centred people.

In Canada if I owned the guns he stole. Deep trouble might await me. Like real prison time. That is unless they were proven to have been really secure including trigger locks. Plus locked up in a pretty substantial containment device. I am not sure even if the amunition could be kept in the same place.

Shooting people with a gun is an extension of personal power in some ways. Most other methology requires a more personal involvement so is not as frequent in my opinion.

Without effective armed guards and locked down schools these issues will continue. Locked down schools are in themselves not safe enough. If I am unbalanced enough to want to get at kids and/or teachers in a locked down school it is not that hard to force an enterance with a vehicle. So you have to have the dedicated armed guards as well. Otherwise it is just a matter of time.

Everytime I hear of one of these occurances or simular I think what a tradgedy for those families and communities involved. Plus what a shame some people are oriented to commit things of this nature. It is also obvious it will happen again as no action has really been made to stop it happening. When and where it will are the only current unknowns.

Last edited by barry12345; 12-14-2012 at 06:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:14 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 52,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
With that thinking, we should also ban the automobile...32,000 died in automobile related deaths in 2011

2011 traffic deaths a record low | Reuters


You can't compare US deaths with Japan's deaths...two different societies. The kids here aren't taught to respect each other or their elders like they are in Japan.

You can't compare either country...they have 127M people compared to our 311M people.
Im sorry. Did this guy accident shoot 27 people or don't intentionally. To equate accidental car death with intentionally homicide seems a bit disingenious.

The effort could be made to sister an track guns much more efficiently but we choose not to. Stop being surprised when people get murdered. Hopefully it want happen to someone e know or close to us. Willing to bet if it does that person will change their POT on gun ownership. Im betting and gun rights folks who just lost a kid are reconsidering.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:14 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graplr View Post
JP, you are barking up the wrong tree here. A car is not designed to kill things. A gun is. People don't drive a car with an intent to kill another person. When a person loads a gun, points it at another human and pulls the trigger they intend to kill that person.

You are right. 12,000 to 311 million is no comparison to 11 to 127 million in a country the size of Montana.
BTW, I didn't say this was the answer, just something to think about as you are correct that we are two very different countries.


I take it you are 100% against regulating guns in any fashion at all?
A simple google search found many cases of people driving a car with the sole intent on running someone down in cold blood...it's just like a loaded weapon.

As for my stance on gun control, quit blaming the weapon, learn to blame the idiot who uses them illegally. I live within the confines of the law, and the law keeps changing because there are those that refuse to live as we should. Changing the current laws would do nothing, especially in this case. The guy is a mentally ill 20 year old. According to CT law, it's against the law for anyone under the age of 21 to possess a handgun.

One report claims that a .223 caliber rifle was used...most people think of assault weapons when they think of .223. If it was an assault weapon, those are also banned in CT.

How's those gun laws working for ya?

The nutjob killed his parents, then killed the kids...NOT THE GUN. The gun is an inanimate object. If they were killed with rocks, would you be saying that we need to discuss rock control laws?
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:16 PM
ruchase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SoCal & NoVA
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rapier View Post
Sounds like Australia or Great Britain are places that have laws to your liking, all you would have to do is emigrate and you'd have exactly what you want, and the people who are unwilling to surrender their Constitutionally guaranteed natural right to protect and preserve their life can have what they want.
Sure, my views on this topic are partial; however, I should qualify my earlier statement. I am specifically referring to assault style / military grade weapons in the hands of regular people. I live in CA and I’m just fine with the assault rifle ban. Does it stop the true criminals from procuring them? No. However, it’s time people give this topic some serious thought.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:21 PM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Well, I am a believer in the right to bear arms but I also think we have a bit too free a situation now with the easy access from gun shows, etc.

I think we are going to have to have locked down schools with metal detectors to get in.

How did this guy get in?

My mrs's school is locked down all day. The lady at the desk has to buzz you in.
All of our schools are locked and everyone needs to be buzzed in. With the POS's mom being a teacher, it may very well have been let in (if so, I can't imagine the guilt the poor person who let it in must be feeling).

That said, for someone hellbent on committing similar atrocities at a school, there's nothing to keep them from shooting the glass out of a door or window to gain access.

I delayed going to our Christmas party to pick up my two youngest boys. Easily twice as many parents picking up today compared to usual. A police officer was at the school all day today.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:22 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 52,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
A simple google search found many cases of people driving a car with the sole intent on running someone down in cold blood...it's just like a loaded weapon.

As for my stance on gun control, quit blaming the weapon, learn to blame the idiot who uses them illegally. I live within the confines of the law, and the law keeps changing because there are those that refuse to live as we should. Changing the current laws would do nothing, especially in this case. The guy is a mentally ill 20 year old. According to CT law, it's against the law for anyone under the age of 21 to possess a handgun.

One report claims that a .223 caliber rifle was used...most people think of assault weapons when they think of .223. If it was an assault weapon, those are also banned in CT.

How's those gun laws working for ya?

The nutjob killed his parents, then killed the kids...NOT THE GUN. The gun is an inanimate object. If they were killed with rocks, would you be saying that we need to discuss rock control laws?
Exactly how would blaming the idiot in CT have prevented the cold blooded murder of 27 people?
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:32 PM
ruchase's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SoCal & NoVA
Posts: 1,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
A simple google search found many cases of people driving a car with the sole intent on running someone down in cold blood...it's just like a loaded weapon.

As for my stance on gun control, quit blaming the weapon, learn to blame the idiot who uses them illegally. I live within the confines of the law, and the law keeps changing because there are those that refuse to live as we should. Changing the current laws would do nothing, especially in this case. The guy is a mentally ill 20 year old. According to CT law, it's against the law for anyone under the age of 21 to possess a handgun.

One report claims that a .223 caliber rifle was used...most people think of assault weapons when they think of .223. If it was an assault weapon, those are also banned in CT.

How's those gun laws working for ya?

The nutjob killed his parents, then killed the kids...NOT THE GUN. The gun is an inanimate object. If they were killed with rocks, would you be saying that we need to discuss rock control laws?
If you wish to compare guns to cars, how about we also compare them to nukes? Nukes are an inanimate object too – yet the entire western world agrees the world should adhere to the non-proliferation treaty. Using your logic, Iran, as a sovereign nation should be allowed to exercise their right and develop a nuke. Just like on an individual level, you are allowed to possess your gun. After all, its not the nuke that’s gonna potentially kill people, right?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:35 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
how about hiring an armed security guard to be on duty at the school?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:38 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuskyMan View Post
how about hiring an armed security guard to be on duty at the school?
Schools are "gun free zones".

I guess that's another law that the murdering punk ignored...
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:44 PM
Graplr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
A simple google search found many cases of people driving a car with the sole intent on running someone down in cold blood...it's just like a loaded weapon.
That is the key here (in my eyes anyway). Singular, not plural. And the person chasing someone with a car is looking to kill someone that they believe did them wrong, not mass amounts of innocent bystanders before they take their own life. Killing mass amounts of people in short order then killing yourself is the issue here. I doubt many of those stories you are referring to the person was trying to kill a mass amount of random people and then have the intent of killing themselves. You are comparing two very different scenarios. We are talking about numerous times a lone (or two) gunman has killed mass amounts of bystanders to go out in style. That is the situation we are talking about. We are not talking about any other incidents where a person tries to do harm to another.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
As for my stance on gun control, quit blaming the weapon, learn to blame the idiot who uses them illegally.
Go back and read my original post #44. I clearly said I blame the killer not the weapon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I live within the confines of the law, and the law keeps changing because there are those that refuse to live as we should. Changing the current laws would do nothing, especially in this case. The guy is a mentally ill 20 year old. According to CT law, it's against the law for anyone under the age of 21 to possess a handgun.

One report claims that a .223 caliber rifle was used...most people think of assault weapons when they think of .223. If it was an assault weapon, those are also banned in CT.

How's those gun laws working for ya?

The nutjob killed his parents, then killed the kids...NOT THE GUN. The gun is an inanimate object.
Again, I clearly stated the shooter killed the people so throw that argument out the window please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
If they were killed with rocks, would you be saying that we need to discuss rock control laws?
Ludacrous statement. You seriously think he could have killed 27 people with a rock? I don't recall hearing multiple stories of people killing mass amounts of people in the past few decades with a rock.

Obviously if someone wants to kill someone they will find a way. Like I stated earlier, I'm on the fence but you are saying that you are refusing to even have a discussion about it.



In all seriousness, from someone that is so against gun control. What is your reasoning against it? (Please say something other than government controlling you)
__________________
2009 ML320 Bluetec
1985 300CD
1981 300TD


Past Mercedes
1979 300TD
1982 300TD
2000 E320 4Matic Wagon
1998 E430
1984 300SD
1980 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:51 PM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 8,459
Felt sick when I heard this news. Amazing to me that these discussions always turn into political gun control debates. Truth is that sick people are sick and he probably would have found another way to do the same thing, like a fire or bomb or something. The rock argument is noy the way to argue that though since its unrealistic so it doesn't really illustrate a point. Either way if any questions are raised it should be about identifying mentally Ill individuals rather than taking away their boomsticks.
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 12-14-2012, 06:52 PM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 14,380
Awful situation.

Maybe we need to be waging a "war on mentally ill ppl" instead of the Taliban?

__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page