Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2011, 05:35 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,241
Rear Crankshaft Rope Seal Replacement Without Removing Crank

I pulled the engine (617) out of my CD to fix some oil leaks. I wanted to replace the front and rear crankshaft seals. The front was fairly easy, but I "opened up a bag of worms" on the rear. I made the mistake of trying to push the rear crankshaft seal around the journal like I used to do on Chevy V8's. Like the numbskull that I can be, I did not consult this forum first and I ruined the old rope seal. I was committed now, and had to replace the upper seal. I went on the forum (a little late) and searched for a how-to on rear seal replacement. Somewhere I read that someone thought it was possible to remove the main caps and lift the crank to get enough room to remove the old seal and replace it. That is they THOUGHT it was possible. Since I did not want to remove the head in order to remove the crank, I decided to at least try it. Well, GOOD NEWS! It is possible, and it is done!

I decided I would take photos and do a how-to for those that would like to replace their rear seal without removing the crank.

Here is the process:
Remove the upper oil pan so you can suspend the engine with chain through the engine damper holes so the flywheel and adapter plate can be removed.

With your engine on an engine stand (bolted to the adapter plate holes), remove the valve cover, cam chain guide, and cam gear.

Next, remove the oil pump and main caps.

You will need to remove the oil jet for the cyl that is on the bottom of it's stroke (to allow the piston to go further down the cyl).


Raise the crank up evenly (about 3/4") and support it in any way that will hold it. I used a piece of wood in front, and a screwdriver in the rear. Remove the old seal. Clean out the seal groove with brake cleaner.


Now would be a good time to replace the front seal as well, providing the pulleys and harmonic balancer are removed before removing main rod caps.

The old and new seal.


Install the new seal so about 1/4 inch is sticking out above the deck on one side. Use a 1/4 drive socket extension to force the seal in the groove, rolling it on the seal surface. There is a pin in the very center, so more pressure will be required there. Put assembly lube on all main journals, and the seal. Lower crank back into the upper bearings.


Install the main caps and torque to proper specs (66 ft. lbs.). Install the oil pump. Trim the seal leaving it 1 mm proud of the deck on both sides. Be careful not to score the surface of the crank. Install the other half of the seal in the upper pan and install the pan using the proper metal to metal sealant (described in another thread).

I will let you know how it worked when I get the engine in the car.


Last edited by ROLLGUY; 05-14-2011 at 10:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:12 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Interesting fix - thanks for sharing.

I see you used the crank and torquing it in place to position the seal in the groove whereas the FSM says to carefully roll into the groove...

...as I said in another thread (Rear main seal) I have been told by an engine builder here in the Netherlands that if this seal isn't seated correctly it can cause localised heating (due to friction) that can knacker the nearest main bearing.

Now I don't know for sure if that is gospel - but it is what I was told.

I would have re-lifted the crank after torquing to make sure it had seated nicely.

Let us know how it goes.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2011, 01:37 AM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,241
I finished the job a while back, and NO LEAKS!!! It was well worth the effort and expense to do the job right.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2011, 02:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army View Post
....I see you used the crank and torquing it in place to position the seal in the groove whereas the FSM says to carefully roll into the groove...
Army, I thought when he said this: "Use a 1/4 drive socket extension to force the seal in the groove, rolling it on the seal surface. " that he was doing what you refer to and the FSM says to do.........???
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2011, 04:35 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post
Army, I thought when he said this: "Use a 1/4 drive socket extension to force the seal in the groove, rolling it on the seal surface. " that he was doing what you refer to and the FSM says to do.........???
Pushing my rope seal in place took a lot of effort - the desire to rub is immense! Roll - don't rub!

Hats off to ROLLGUY for managing this with a 1/4" drive socket extension.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2011, 10:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
Yes, clearly he did not have the room shown in the FSM when they did not have the crank so close to the seal.... but he sure had to do a lot of heavy lifting to manage this ...since he said ' rolling' I am hopeful everything went in perfectly... or maybe he is stronger than you and I are ? LOL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2011, 11:30 AM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
Rumor has it the rear rope seal can be replaced with engine in the car. By rumor I read it years back in one thread. Never heard or seen any other ref to that.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2011, 11:56 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post
Yes, clearly he did not have the room shown in the FSM when they did not have the crank so close to the seal.... but he sure had to do a lot of heavy lifting to manage this ...since he said ' rolling' I am hopeful everything went in perfectly... or maybe he is stronger than you and I are ? LOL
Uh oh - are we back to boasting about our ballet dancing around garages with engine blocks under each wing again? Mine was an OM617 and yours was an old XK120 Jag wasn't it?
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2011, 12:00 PM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by winmutt View Post
Rumor has it the rear rope seal can be replaced with engine in the car. By rumor I read it years back in one thread. Never heard or seen any other ref to that.
You could probably change the seal in the upper oil pan with the engine in place (more or less - perhaps a bit of lifting so the oil pan clears the cross member and the engine shocks). But if it was the whole seal - well wow I'd like to see that!

I bet they did something really clever like removing the upper oil pan and then spinning the engine up to 30,000 RPM - watch the old seal squeal and jump out whilst carefully feeding in the new one - whilst keeping all their fingers... it must have been magic...
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2011, 12:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army View Post
Uh oh - are we back to boasting about our ballet dancing around garages with engine blocks under each wing again? Mine was an OM617 and yours was an old XK120 Jag wasn't it?
That was clearly placed in a ' stupid things I did as a youth' thread...not something I am proud of...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-27-2011, 12:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: central Texas
Posts: 17,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by winmutt View Post
Rumor has it the rear rope seal can be replaced with engine in the car. By rumor I read it years back in one thread. Never heard or seen any other ref to that.
Those rumors were dispelled by pictures posted several times of the PIN in the top...which keeps a new one from being ' slid' in....which on some American cars... was one of the neatest tricks I ever participated in... much like attaching our new chains to the old ones and rolling them in...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-27-2011, 10:56 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by winmutt View Post
Rumor has it the rear rope seal can be replaced with engine in the car. By rumor I read it years back in one thread. Never heard or seen any other ref to that.
The rumor is false (partly). The only way to replace the UPPER half of the rope seal is to remove the engine from the car. Yes, the upper pan is removable with the engine in the car, but a real pain in the rear. IMO the entire rope seal needs to be replaced if a leak is present.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-27-2011, 11:01 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Army View Post
Pushing my rope seal in place took a lot of effort - the desire to rub is immense! Roll - don't rub!

Hats off to ROLLGUY for managing this with a 1/4" drive socket extension.
The hardest part is forcing the seal into the pin. The rest of the seal rolls in quite easy with a thin round object (1/4" drive extension). You must also use assembly lube on the seal (making sure not to get any lube on the ends of the seal where the two halves join).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-27-2011, 11:07 PM
dkveuro's Avatar
Sword of Damocles
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here an' there.
Posts: 2,548
Here's something interesting but not MBZ.......retro install !

http://www.justanswer.com/classic-cars/4hwai-cadillac-deville-1965-deville-rear-main-leak.html

Why not have the "pin" in the cap instead of the block?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-28-2011, 12:07 AM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkveuro View Post
Here's something interesting but not MBZ.......retro install !

http://www.justanswer.com/classic-cars/4hwai-cadillac-deville-1965-deville-rear-main-leak.html

Why not have the "pin" in the cap instead of the block?
Both parts of the seal in an MB Diesel are not part of the bearing cap. If just replacing the lower seal, the main bearing cap does not need to be removed.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page