Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-28-2012, 05:11 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHZR2 View Post
What's the matter with it? What petrol engine?
petrol green is the name Mercedes called their teal green, the car is nonturbo, needs a k1 spring kit in the tranz.

Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-29-2012, 12:44 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,281
Aaah, thats what I thought. Wasnt sure though. Is that all thats wrong? Might be interested!
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-13-2012, 09:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 47
1984 300CD for sale

I'm selling my 1984 300CD Turbodiesel. Car is good for restoration/project or good parts car. Car has not run in approx. 10 years. When last run, engine had a knock. Intertior is rough. Rust is minimal. Located in South Jersey. $800 609-859-5423 Also, have good engine available, $450. See pics in Forum Cars for Sale.
__________________
97 210.020 252,500 Daily Driver
87 124.133 215,000 Daily Driver
87 124.133 605,000 Retired
87 123.133 345,000 Totaled
84 123.133 550,000 Sold
84 123.153 350,000 Awaiting Motor
82 123.133 505,000 Retired
77 123.123 Unknown Sold
80 42' Bertram 475HP 692's w/twin dry turbos
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-21-2013, 11:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1
300cd

I found an exceptional, low mileage 1981 300cd, which I am seriously considering, however it seems very slow to accelerate. There are no service records, and I doubt it has had more than periodic lubrication.

The car seems too nice to modify, but it could be a hazard in freeway traffic, where one might be assalted for delaying progress.

Typically modified near classic cars immediately decline in value. So, is a clean cd likely to increase in value? And if sacrifical, what modifications have been most cost effective?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-22-2013, 03:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SF, CA, USA
Posts: 935
croughbonz, clearing the ALDA line, new fuel filters, rebuild injectors, adjust valves, etc. are easy fixes which, if the engine is intact, should bring it back to respectable performance. you might have a professional check the compression on the engine before buying it. start a new thread to talk about engines if you like, though, as this question has nothing to do with coupes.
__________________
'77 240D, 504H, OM617.952, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-22-2013, 06:46 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zacharias View Post
I sure do. For two reasons:

1. My own crappy judgement. I got royally ripped off on a long-distance deal by a bottom-feeder. That's on me.

2. Never saw any mention, until after I owned it, of the headroom issue. As in much less than a sedan. As in, I am 6ft 4ins and I can barely hold my head up in the car.

Great. A rusty** garden shed on wheels that I can't even drive comfortably.

**: yes, Coupes RUST. Even in California, when the windshield seal has leaked like a sieve into the car and the water has sat on the floor (I got it from Cali, but I wonder if the car spent some of its life further north on the west coast).
X3 or 4 on the headroom. I passed up on an 82 in decent condition for th same reason. Compared to the sedans, the coupe feels quite cramped. Simpler-better, I think you might be a bit taller than I. Id definitely go for a decent drive in someones coupe with a good working adjustable seat before commiting to buy one. Be worth it to really get a feel for the car
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-22-2013, 10:14 AM
Simpler=Better's Avatar
Ham Shanker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by JB3 View Post
X3 or 4 on the headroom. I passed up on an 82 in decent condition for th same reason. Compared to the sedans, the coupe feels quite cramped. Simpler-better, I think you might be a bit taller than I. Id definitely go for a decent drive in someones coupe with a good working adjustable seat before commiting to buy one. Be worth it to really get a feel for the car
Yeah, if I ever wind up with a coupe I'm swapping in bucket seats from another car(TBD). In my w123 sedan I had to lean way back or I'd smack my head on the roof all the time. Same in my DD, but I'd rather have the leg angle of a truck than cut down the seat brackets.
__________________
$60 OM617 Blank Exhaust Flanges
$110 OM606 Blank Exhaust Flanges
No merc at the moment
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-22-2013, 11:38 AM
Smoker's Avatar
Fast Attack Submarines
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Central Florida
Posts: 473
I absolutely regret my CD, but because it's an om617 turbo, not because of the coupe body. Mine is unmolested, now running well, but I may let it go simply because i prefer the non turbo om616 and 617.

I've near 6k in the car now. I'd take my bath and fleabay it for 4 and put it under my lessons learned, or maybe I'll put it up for swap.
__________________
Eric, CPO, Submarines, retired.
Here's a sig line...
Mine: '68 Corvette LS1/4L65E, 83 240D, 2000 GMC 4x4, 08 FLSTC Anniv
Hers: '72 Corvette 454/4spd, '99 MB SLK, '93 Metro vert, 78 240D, '92 Silverado, '65 Fjord Rustang, '59 Fjord Fairlane, '17 Slingshot.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-22-2013, 11:57 AM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,230
This is an older thread, but since I found it, I will respond. I don't regret owning a CD at all. My first 'Benz was a 1982 300CD Signal Red with a black interior. I have only seen one other CD in that color (in mach4's thread on a car carrier). I thoroughly enjoyed every bit of owning, fixing, and driving the car. At first I did not even know what I had. I just bought the first Diesel car I could afford. Later I found out how much in demand a rust free CD in a fairly rare color combo was worth. Since that first 'Benz, I am up to about 26 (5 being coupes) that I have owned. That first one was my favorite, and my second favorite was the other '82 that my niece now has.
W123 300CD Project but what to do....
I don't regret having any 'Benz at all. They are all fun, and worth every penny I have spent on them...Rich
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-22-2013, 03:37 PM
Smoker's Avatar
Fast Attack Submarines
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Central Florida
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLLGUY View Post
I don't regret having any 'Benz at all. They are all fun, and worth every penny I have spent on them...Rich
I think out of the dozens (well, over 100 but i'm counting when I had a tow truck and bought cars at salvage auctions to fix and resell), I've owned there is only one great regret, and two 'really wish I hadn't'. The great regret was selling my '69 Superbee for $800 when I was a kid that didn't know any better. I've literally cried over not having it (or one like it), back when I used to drink. If I ever win the lottery I'm getting one.

The two 'wish I hadn'ts' were a '66 two stroke saab and this '82 300CD. Both are cars that just seem to dislike me. Both a history of me going in to do full restorations, and in both cases I made some costly mistakes. I finished the 2 stroke saab and sold it for a pittance to get it out of my sight, buyer made a killing reselling it. The CD may sell, if not I'll drive it awhile before doing the interior to see if it wants to be nice.
__________________
Eric, CPO, Submarines, retired.
Here's a sig line...
Mine: '68 Corvette LS1/4L65E, 83 240D, 2000 GMC 4x4, 08 FLSTC Anniv
Hers: '72 Corvette 454/4spd, '99 MB SLK, '93 Metro vert, 78 240D, '92 Silverado, '65 Fjord Rustang, '59 Fjord Fairlane, '17 Slingshot.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-23-2013, 08:13 AM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Croughbonz, adjust the valves and maybe check the compression.

The 81 coupes didn't have a turbo, AFAIK.

Shouldn't be THAT slow.

A friend had a non turbo CD, didn't seem to be dangerously slow.
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-23-2013, 10:00 AM
Smoker's Avatar
Fast Attack Submarines
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Central Florida
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by toomany MBZ View Post
Croughbonz, adjust the valves and maybe check the compression.

The 81 coupes didn't have a turbo, AFAIK.

Shouldn't be THAT slow.

A friend had a non turbo CD, didn't seem to be dangerously slow.
Ya, I don't even find the OM616 to be 'dangerously' slow....something wrong.
__________________
Eric, CPO, Submarines, retired.
Here's a sig line...
Mine: '68 Corvette LS1/4L65E, 83 240D, 2000 GMC 4x4, 08 FLSTC Anniv
Hers: '72 Corvette 454/4spd, '99 MB SLK, '93 Metro vert, 78 240D, '92 Silverado, '65 Fjord Rustang, '59 Fjord Fairlane, '17 Slingshot.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-23-2013, 10:49 AM
Slow Attack Submarines
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 242
My first MB was an 82 300CD, Signal Red with black interior, a $1000 beater that ended up being a reliable daily driver that needed minimal work for the 40,000 miles I put on it. I'd still have it if work hadn't forced me to sell (five days to get across the country to make a deployment).

If I saw another one in good shape I'd pick it up.
__________________
1992 300D 2.5T 249k - Parked with a bad transmission
1981 300SD 142k - Daily driver
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-23-2013, 11:01 AM
uberwasser's Avatar
1979 & 1985 300D's
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Croughbonz
The car seems too nice to modify, but it could be a hazard in freeway traffic, where one might be assalted for delaying progress.
My '79 300D (Turbo-free vehicle...) would be considered fairly equivalent; it gets up to 65mph by the end of on-ramps and I've cruised in the fast lane at 80mph. I think they should top out closer to 95.

So it's definitely a problem with that vehicle and not indicative of them in general.
__________________
1979 300D 040 Black on Black - 1985 300D Maaco job (sadly sprayed over 199 Black Pearl Metallic) on Palamino

http://i.imgur.com/LslW733.jpg

The Baja Arizona Oil Burners Send a message if you'd like to join the fun
Left to Right - UberWasser, Iridium, Stuttgart-->Seattle,, mannys9130

Visit the W123 page on iFixit for over 70 helpful DIY guides!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-23-2013, 11:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
My 83 coupe still moves along very well ,enough so to quickly excellerate past most gassers from a light ,I love it when a young kid drives up in a new ride and gives it the gas ,I get a look of despare as they drive faster to pull in frt of me,all to no avail from a car that was built before they were blowing spit bubbles during nappy time.


Last edited by chasinthesun; 11-24-2013 at 01:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page